<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 1170 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186440</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for AYs 2004-05 and 2005-06. It confirmed additions towards suppression of sales due to lack of evidence but deleted disallowances of business promotion expenses for lack of supporting evidence. The Tribunal also partially allowed disallowances under section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, granting relief for certain payments while upholding others, emphasizing the need for proper documentation and adherence to tax regulations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2016 10:37:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441543" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 1170 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186440</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for AYs 2004-05 and 2005-06. It confirmed additions towards suppression of sales due to lack of evidence but deleted disallowances of business promotion expenses for lack of supporting evidence. The Tribunal also partially allowed disallowances under section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, granting relief for certain payments while upholding others, emphasizing the need for proper documentation and adherence to tax regulations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186440</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>