<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 651 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186435</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the interest earned on fixed deposits invested to obtain a letter of credit should be classified as business income rather than income from other sources. The court overturned the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, confirming the original assessment treating the interest as business income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2016 18:14:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 651 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186435</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the interest earned on fixed deposits invested to obtain a letter of credit should be classified as business income rather than income from other sources. The court overturned the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, confirming the original assessment treating the interest as business income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186435</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>