https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332479 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand for service tax liability for services provided to a sugar factory. The decision was based on a precedent set by a similar case before the High Court, which determined that the services provided, including harvesting of sugar cane, loading, and unloading, did not fall under the category of Manpower Recruitment and Supply Agency Services. Consequently, the impugned order was deemed unsustainable, and the appeal was allowed. en-us Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Sep 2016 12:05:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332479 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand for service tax liability for services provided to a sugar factory. The decision was based on a precedent set by a similar case before the High Court, which determined that the services provided, including harvesting of sugar cane, loading, and unloading, did not fall under the category of Manpower Recruitment and Supply Agency Services. Consequently, the impugned order was deemed unsustainable, and the appeal was allowed. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332479