<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 728 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332467</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Adjudicating Authority for re-determination of the Cenvat Credit amount, considering the depreciated value of the capital goods. The Tribunal found the demand for Cenvat Credit within the normal limitation period and dismissed the argument of limitation. The imposition of penalty was deferred pending the re-quantification of the Cenvat Credit amount. The appeal was disposed of with the impugned order set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2016 11:59:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441494" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 728 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332467</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Adjudicating Authority for re-determination of the Cenvat Credit amount, considering the depreciated value of the capital goods. The Tribunal found the demand for Cenvat Credit within the normal limitation period and dismissed the argument of limitation. The imposition of penalty was deferred pending the re-quantification of the Cenvat Credit amount. The appeal was disposed of with the impugned order set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332467</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>