<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 711 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332450</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to recompute income based on the average gross profit rate of immediate earlier assessment years. The judgment stressed the significance of reliable evidence and past history in assessing income discrepancies, emphasizing that subsequent information cannot be the basis for estimating purchases in earlier years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2016 11:37:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441464" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 711 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332450</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to recompute income based on the average gross profit rate of immediate earlier assessment years. The judgment stressed the significance of reliable evidence and past history in assessing income discrepancies, emphasizing that subsequent information cannot be the basis for estimating purchases in earlier years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332450</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>