<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 708 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332447</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals filed by the assessee, upholding the disallowance of interest amounting to ? 53,76,200 and the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the interest claimed was not paid to the creditors as per the Memorandum of Understanding and that inaccurate particulars were furnished to evade tax liability. The order was pronounced on 5th August 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2016 10:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 708 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332447</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals filed by the assessee, upholding the disallowance of interest amounting to ? 53,76,200 and the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the interest claimed was not paid to the creditors as per the Memorandum of Understanding and that inaccurate particulars were furnished to evade tax liability. The order was pronounced on 5th August 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332447</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>