<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 703 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332442</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the tax appeal, upholding the decisions of the Commissioner and Tribunal to delete quantum additions made by the Assessing Officer. The Court clarified that the Assessing Officer could reframe assessments based on a revisional order without specific directions, allowing the assessee to challenge the order on merits. Additionally, the Court rejected the Revenue&#039;s argument that the assessee, by accepting the revisional order, forfeited the right to appeal the Assessing Officer&#039;s consequential order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2016 11:36:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441456" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 703 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332442</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the tax appeal, upholding the decisions of the Commissioner and Tribunal to delete quantum additions made by the Assessing Officer. The Court clarified that the Assessing Officer could reframe assessments based on a revisional order without specific directions, allowing the assessee to challenge the order on merits. Additionally, the Court rejected the Revenue&#039;s argument that the assessee, by accepting the revisional order, forfeited the right to appeal the Assessing Officer&#039;s consequential order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332442</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>