<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 699 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332438</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in a tax case appeal, affirming the eligibility of a primary agricultural society for deduction under Section 80 P (2) (a) (i) for interest received from non-agricultural society members. The Court also confirmed the entitlement of Class B members to the deduction despite limitations on their voting and meeting rights. Additionally, the Court supported the deduction under Section 80 P (2) (d) for interest earned from a cooperative bank, emphasizing the cooperative nature and benefits to society members. The appeal was dismissed in favor of the assessee based on the cooperative structure and purpose of the entities involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2016 11:36:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441452" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 699 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332438</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in a tax case appeal, affirming the eligibility of a primary agricultural society for deduction under Section 80 P (2) (a) (i) for interest received from non-agricultural society members. The Court also confirmed the entitlement of Class B members to the deduction despite limitations on their voting and meeting rights. Additionally, the Court supported the deduction under Section 80 P (2) (d) for interest earned from a cooperative bank, emphasizing the cooperative nature and benefits to society members. The appeal was dismissed in favor of the assessee based on the cooperative structure and purpose of the entities involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>