<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 695 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332434</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals and deleted penalties imposed for various issues, emphasizing that penalties under section 271(1)(c) are not justified when additions are based on estimates or bona fide errors. The Tribunal referenced High Court and Supreme Court judgments to support its decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 18:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441448" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 695 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332434</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals and deleted penalties imposed for various issues, emphasizing that penalties under section 271(1)(c) are not justified when additions are based on estimates or bona fide errors. The Tribunal referenced High Court and Supreme Court judgments to support its decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>