<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1571 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186426</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to limit the addition of undisclosed income to the valuation provided by the DVO, amounting to Rs. 24,15,000. The Tribunal found the DVO&#039;s valuation binding on the Assessing Officer and the Revenue, in line with a judgment of the Allahabad High Court. The decision was pronounced on 18-11-2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2016 11:14:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441445" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1571 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186426</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to limit the addition of undisclosed income to the valuation provided by the DVO, amounting to Rs. 24,15,000. The Tribunal found the DVO&#039;s valuation binding on the Assessing Officer and the Revenue, in line with a judgment of the Allahabad High Court. The decision was pronounced on 18-11-2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186426</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>