<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1126 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186427</link>
    <description>The Court directed the petitioner to pursue appellate remedies, emphasizing the need for proper redress through the appellate process and the consideration of waiver applications in accordance with established legal principles. The Court deferred coercive actions against the petitioner for three months to allow for the exploration of alternative remedies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2016 11:14:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441444" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1126 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186427</link>
      <description>The Court directed the petitioner to pursue appellate remedies, emphasizing the need for proper redress through the appellate process and the consideration of waiver applications in accordance with established legal principles. The Court deferred coercive actions against the petitioner for three months to allow for the exploration of alternative remedies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186427</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>