<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 689 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186425</link>
    <description>The appeal involved a dispute over disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D of IT Rules, 1962 and the levy of interest under section 234B concerning assessment under section 115JB. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the disallowance issue, directing a reassessment by the Assessing Officer based on the non-retrospective application of Rule 8D. However, concerning the interest under section 234B, the Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT (A) but instructed a recalculation by the Assessing Officer in line with the Tribunal&#039;s order. The appeal was partially allowed for statistical purposes following the Tribunal&#039;s directives.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2016 10:22:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441438" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 689 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186425</link>
      <description>The appeal involved a dispute over disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D of IT Rules, 1962 and the levy of interest under section 234B concerning assessment under section 115JB. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the disallowance issue, directing a reassessment by the Assessing Officer based on the non-retrospective application of Rule 8D. However, concerning the interest under section 234B, the Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT (A) but instructed a recalculation by the Assessing Officer in line with the Tribunal&#039;s order. The appeal was partially allowed for statistical purposes following the Tribunal&#039;s directives.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186425</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>