<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 772 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186419</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s judgment and affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision regarding the deduction of staff provident fund dues for the assessment year 1998-99. The Court emphasized the binding nature of the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in a related case and held that the amendment to the Income-tax Act did not apply retrospectively, thereby allowing the deduction claimed by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 18:13:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441426" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 772 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186419</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s judgment and affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision regarding the deduction of staff provident fund dues for the assessment year 1998-99. The Court emphasized the binding nature of the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in a related case and held that the amendment to the Income-tax Act did not apply retrospectively, thereby allowing the deduction claimed by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>