<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 1134 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186399</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI remanded the appeals of M/s. Havells India Ltd. and the Revenue to the Commissioner for fresh adjudication. The dispute over deductions for cash discounts and equalized freight led to the Tribunal setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appellant to present necessary documentation. Both parties&#039; appeals were remanded for a joint decision, providing an opportunity for the appellant to produce the required evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 14:24:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441386" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 1134 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186399</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI remanded the appeals of M/s. Havells India Ltd. and the Revenue to the Commissioner for fresh adjudication. The dispute over deductions for cash discounts and equalized freight led to the Tribunal setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appellant to present necessary documentation. Both parties&#039; appeals were remanded for a joint decision, providing an opportunity for the appellant to produce the required evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186399</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>