<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 684 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332423</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to allow the appellant&#039;s input credit availed before payment, reject the demand for interest, and decline the penalty imposition. The judgment emphasized prioritizing substance over technicalities in credit availment and payment compliance under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 13:42:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441378" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 684 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332423</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to allow the appellant&#039;s input credit availed before payment, reject the demand for interest, and decline the penalty imposition. The judgment emphasized prioritizing substance over technicalities in credit availment and payment compliance under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332423</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>