<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 678 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332417</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned order, and granted consequential relief to the appellant. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of proving marketability and correct classification for imposing excise duty and penalties. The Department failed to establish the marketability and correct classification of the sugar syrup, leading to the setting aside of penalties and interest demands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 13:42:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441372" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 678 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332417</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned order, and granted consequential relief to the appellant. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of proving marketability and correct classification for imposing excise duty and penalties. The Department failed to establish the marketability and correct classification of the sugar syrup, leading to the setting aside of penalties and interest demands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332417</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>