<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Overturns Settlement Commission&#039;s Decision; Petitioner Not Liable for Entire Import Duty on DEPB License.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=31250</link>
    <description>Validity of order of Settlement Commission - One cannot lose sight of the fact that the importers purchased the DEPB license from the petitioner for valuable consideration. Hence it is only fair that the petitioner pays the entire import duty – rejection of application by settlement commission not correct. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 13:37:32 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 13:37:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441367" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Overturns Settlement Commission&#039;s Decision; Petitioner Not Liable for Entire Import Duty on DEPB License.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=31250</link>
      <description>Validity of order of Settlement Commission - One cannot lose sight of the fact that the importers purchased the DEPB license from the petitioner for valuable consideration. Hence it is only fair that the petitioner pays the entire import duty – rejection of application by settlement commission not correct. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 13:37:32 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=31250</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>