<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 1034 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186395</link>
    <description>The court set aside the impugned Circular dated 03.04.2008, ruling that it was inconsistent with the SEZ Act and SEZ Rules by imposing an additional condition not present in the statutory provisions. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2023 09:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441355" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 1034 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186395</link>
      <description>The court set aside the impugned Circular dated 03.04.2008, ruling that it was inconsistent with the SEZ Act and SEZ Rules by imposing an additional condition not present in the statutory provisions. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186395</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>