https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332400 Packaging and labelling compliance for imported edible products raised technical questions on label particulars, manufacturer or source disclosure, language particulars, batch details and ingredient information. In Article 226 jurisdiction, the Madras HC declined to examine disputed factual compliance or interfere with the impugned decision itself, holding that such issues were for the competent authority. The petitioner was directed to seek one-time relaxation before that authority, which was to consider the request on merits in accordance with law. en-us Fri, 03 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Sep 2016 12:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332400 Packaging and labelling compliance for imported edible products raised technical questions on label particulars, manufacturer or source disclosure, language particulars, batch details and ingredient information. In Article 226 jurisdiction, the Madras HC declined to examine disputed factual compliance or interfere with the impugned decision itself, holding that such issues were for the competent authority. The petitioner was directed to seek one-time relaxation before that authority, which was to consider the request on merits in accordance with law. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 03 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332400