<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 656 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332395</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals for both assessment years regarding the deduction under Section 80IA(4) for Container Freight Station (CFS) as an inland port. It partly allowed the assessee&#039;s cross objections by deleting the disallowance of interest expenditure under Section 14A but upheld the disallowance of indirect expenditure under Rule 8D(2)(iii). The order was pronounced in the open court on 4th August 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 11:37:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441331" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 656 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332395</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals for both assessment years regarding the deduction under Section 80IA(4) for Container Freight Station (CFS) as an inland port. It partly allowed the assessee&#039;s cross objections by deleting the disallowance of interest expenditure under Section 14A but upheld the disallowance of indirect expenditure under Rule 8D(2)(iii). The order was pronounced in the open court on 4th August 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332395</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>