<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 642 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332381</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, setting aside the disallowance under Section 14A and remanding it to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled that the surplus from the sale of rights should be treated as capital gains, not business income. The decision was pronounced on 05/08/2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 11:35:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441316" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 642 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332381</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, setting aside the disallowance under Section 14A and remanding it to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled that the surplus from the sale of rights should be treated as capital gains, not business income. The decision was pronounced on 05/08/2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332381</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>