<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 640 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332379</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all appeals filed by the assessee, deleting the additions made by the AO for various trading discrepancies and undisclosed income, confirming that the surrendered amount in AY 2002-03 covered the disputed additions for previous years. The Tribunal relied on the concept of telescoping and relevant case law to support its decision. The order was pronounced in the open court on 04/08/2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 11:35:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441314" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 640 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332379</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all appeals filed by the assessee, deleting the additions made by the AO for various trading discrepancies and undisclosed income, confirming that the surrendered amount in AY 2002-03 covered the disputed additions for previous years. The Tribunal relied on the concept of telescoping and relevant case law to support its decision. The order was pronounced in the open court on 04/08/2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>