https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186388 Pleadings under Order 6 Rule 2(1) CPC need only state material facts concisely, not evidence, and fuller particulars may be given where necessary under Order 6 Rule 5 CPC. A plaint that clearly identifies the original tenant and alleges unlawful induction of occupants during the suit is sufficient, even if some averments are made by way of abundant caution. In supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227, a High Court should not disturb concurrent findings of unlawful subletting on a mere pleading objection when the material facts are adequately conveyed. en-us Wed, 11 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Sep 2016 10:42:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186388 Pleadings under Order 6 Rule 2(1) CPC need only state material facts concisely, not evidence, and fuller particulars may be given where necessary under Order 6 Rule 5 CPC. A plaint that clearly identifies the original tenant and alleges unlawful induction of occupants during the suit is sufficient, even if some averments are made by way of abundant caution. In supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227, a High Court should not disturb concurrent findings of unlawful subletting on a mere pleading objection when the material facts are adequately conveyed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 11 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186388