<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 750 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186384</link>
    <description>Bombay HC noted that a similar question raised by the Revenue in the assessee&#039;s own earlier appeal had already been dismissed the same day. Relying on that earlier dismissal, the Court dismissed the present income tax appeal and made no order as to costs. The text records only that the dispute followed the outcome in the connected matter and does not set out any separate substantive reasoning on the tax issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2016 18:30:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441294" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 750 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186384</link>
      <description>Bombay HC noted that a similar question raised by the Revenue in the assessee&#039;s own earlier appeal had already been dismissed the same day. Relying on that earlier dismissal, the Court dismissed the present income tax appeal and made no order as to costs. The text records only that the dispute followed the outcome in the connected matter and does not set out any separate substantive reasoning on the tax issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186384</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>