https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186359 In a disproportionate-assets prosecution, the Court held that the accused has no right to a pre-FIR hearing before registration of the case, because the obligation to satisfactorily account for assets arises at trial. It also held that the sanction was not invalid merely because it did not contain elaborate reasons, where the accompanying material showed prima facie application of mind. Allegations of mala fides, by themselves, did not justify quashing when the prosecution was supported by specific factual averments and collected material. The power to quash criminal proceedings was said to be exceptional and to be used sparingly. en-us Thu, 30 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Sep 2016 12:52:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186359 In a disproportionate-assets prosecution, the Court held that the accused has no right to a pre-FIR hearing before registration of the case, because the obligation to satisfactorily account for assets arises at trial. It also held that the sanction was not invalid merely because it did not contain elaborate reasons, where the accompanying material showed prima facie application of mind. Allegations of mala fides, by themselves, did not justify quashing when the prosecution was supported by specific factual averments and collected material. The power to quash criminal proceedings was said to be exceptional and to be used sparingly. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 30 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186359