<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 1049 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186357</link>
    <description>A prosecution sanction is valid where the record shows conscious consideration of the relevant material and the competent authority records satisfaction for prosecution; an express recital of personal scrutiny is not required. On the facts noted, the trap was proved and tainted currency was recovered from the respondent, and the absence of a credible explanation for possession of the treated money could not be ignored. The courts below erred in treating the matter as unproved merely on a supposed defect in sanction. The judgments below were set aside and the matter was remanded for decision on merits in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2016 12:41:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441256" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 1049 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186357</link>
      <description>A prosecution sanction is valid where the record shows conscious consideration of the relevant material and the competent authority records satisfaction for prosecution; an express recital of personal scrutiny is not required. On the facts noted, the trap was proved and tainted currency was recovered from the respondent, and the absence of a credible explanation for possession of the treated money could not be ignored. The courts below erred in treating the matter as unproved merely on a supposed defect in sanction. The judgments below were set aside and the matter was remanded for decision on merits in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186357</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>