<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 629 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332368</link>
    <description>Voluntary payment of duty immediately after detection of non-accountal of goods justified leniency in penalty under Rule 25 read with Section 11AC. The tribunal held that such payment was not, by itself, an admission requiring full penalty, and that the quantum could be moderated in the interest of justice. Accordingly, the penalty on the appellant company was reduced and the personal penalty on the authorised signatory was also reduced. The duty-related benefit was not granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2016 10:58:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441221" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 629 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332368</link>
      <description>Voluntary payment of duty immediately after detection of non-accountal of goods justified leniency in penalty under Rule 25 read with Section 11AC. The tribunal held that such payment was not, by itself, an admission requiring full penalty, and that the quantum could be moderated in the interest of justice. Accordingly, the penalty on the appellant company was reduced and the personal penalty on the authorised signatory was also reduced. The duty-related benefit was not granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332368</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>