<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 626 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332365</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing them to utilize the accumulated Cenvat credit of duty earned before opting for exemption under notification 30/2004-CE dated 09.07.2004. The tribunal held that the introduction of Rule 11(3) had prospective application from 01.03.2007, and as the appellant&#039;s case pertained to a period before this date, their credits should not lapse.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2016 10:58:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441218" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 626 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332365</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing them to utilize the accumulated Cenvat credit of duty earned before opting for exemption under notification 30/2004-CE dated 09.07.2004. The tribunal held that the introduction of Rule 11(3) had prospective application from 01.03.2007, and as the appellant&#039;s case pertained to a period before this date, their credits should not lapse.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>