<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 996 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186353</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court of India in 2009 held that parties should resort to Alternate Dispute Resolution Mechanism under section 144C of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The competent authority cannot reject the application based on the cut-off date and must decide the matter despite a pending appeal before the CIT(A). Special Leave Petitions were disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2016 10:48:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441210" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 996 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186353</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court of India in 2009 held that parties should resort to Alternate Dispute Resolution Mechanism under section 144C of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The competent authority cannot reject the application based on the cut-off date and must decide the matter despite a pending appeal before the CIT(A). Special Leave Petitions were disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186353</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>