https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332357 The court dismissed the appeal due to lack of jurisdiction under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, without delving into the case merits. The court emphasized that any judgment passed without jurisdiction would be void, leading to the appeal's dismissal despite its ten-year pendency, with no costs awarded. en-us Tue, 30 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Aug 2017 11:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332357 The court dismissed the appeal due to lack of jurisdiction under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, without delving into the case merits. The court emphasized that any judgment passed without jurisdiction would be void, leading to the appeal's dismissal despite its ten-year pendency, with no costs awarded. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 30 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332357