https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186347 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the proceedings initiated by the Central Excise Department were time-barred as the Show Cause Notice (SCN) was issued beyond the one-year limitation period without specific allegations justifying an extended period. Consequently, the service tax demand confirmed in the Adjudication order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief. en-us Thu, 03 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Sep 2016 08:41:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186347 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the proceedings initiated by the Central Excise Department were time-barred as the Show Cause Notice (SCN) was issued beyond the one-year limitation period without specific allegations justifying an extended period. Consequently, the service tax demand confirmed in the Adjudication order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 03 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186347