<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1952 (3) TMI 41 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186326</link>
    <description>A loan advanced in the course of a money-lending business may qualify for bad-debt deduction, but the decisive question is when the debt actually became irrecoverable. The Bombay HC noted that the assessee was carrying on money-lending activity and the advance was treated as a business loan, not an isolated arrangement. It also stated that deduction cannot rest on the mere write-off; the debt must in fact have become irrecoverable in the relevant year of account. The timing of irrecoverability is a question of fact for the tribunal, and a finding that the debt was only practically irrecoverable in an earlier year is not enough without a clear factual conclusion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2016 16:20:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441134" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1952 (3) TMI 41 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186326</link>
      <description>A loan advanced in the course of a money-lending business may qualify for bad-debt deduction, but the decisive question is when the debt actually became irrecoverable. The Bombay HC noted that the assessee was carrying on money-lending activity and the advance was treated as a business loan, not an isolated arrangement. It also stated that deduction cannot rest on the mere write-off; the debt must in fact have become irrecoverable in the relevant year of account. The timing of irrecoverability is a question of fact for the tribunal, and a finding that the debt was only practically irrecoverable in an earlier year is not enough without a clear factual conclusion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>