https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332322 An appeal dismissed for non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F was restored because the hearing notice was issued for a later date than the date relied on by the applicant, and the stay order had been passed ex parte. Since the merits had not been considered before dismissal, recall of the earlier orders was warranted in the interest of justice. The restoration application was allowed, the orders dated 06.10.2015 and 15.12.2015 were recalled, and the appeal was restored for hearing. en-us Tue, 12 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Sep 2016 15:14:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332322 An appeal dismissed for non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F was restored because the hearing notice was issued for a later date than the date relied on by the applicant, and the stay order had been passed ex parte. Since the merits had not been considered before dismissal, recall of the earlier orders was warranted in the interest of justice. The restoration application was allowed, the orders dated 06.10.2015 and 15.12.2015 were recalled, and the appeal was restored for hearing. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 12 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332322