<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 577 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332316</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal by remanding the matter to the Original Adjudicating Authority for a re-evaluation of duty demand related to the amortization of the cost of dies/moulds on the value of manufactured goods. The appellant&#039;s argument that excise duty was already paid on the dies/moulds and further amortization was unnecessary was considered valid due to discrepancies in the revenue&#039;s treatment of dies/moulds and lack of proper amortization methodology. The appellant was granted an opportunity to present their case during the re-examination process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2017 14:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441112" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 577 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332316</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal by remanding the matter to the Original Adjudicating Authority for a re-evaluation of duty demand related to the amortization of the cost of dies/moulds on the value of manufactured goods. The appellant&#039;s argument that excise duty was already paid on the dies/moulds and further amortization was unnecessary was considered valid due to discrepancies in the revenue&#039;s treatment of dies/moulds and lack of proper amortization methodology. The appellant was granted an opportunity to present their case during the re-examination process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332316</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>