<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 575 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332314</link>
    <description>The appellate authority allowed the appeal of a manufacturer of Iron and Steel products, setting aside the order that denied Cenvat credit, imposed duty demand, and penalties. The authority found discrepancies in the invoicing and transportation process but accepted the appellant&#039;s evidence of proper documentation and payment to the transporter. The Revenue&#039;s allegations of incapability of vehicles used for transportation were deemed baseless as they lacked concrete evidence. The appellant&#039;s documented evidence remained uncontested, leading to the conclusion that the Revenue&#039;s claims were unsupported. The appeal was granted, emphasizing the importance of substantiated evidence in such disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2017 16:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441108" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 575 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332314</link>
      <description>The appellate authority allowed the appeal of a manufacturer of Iron and Steel products, setting aside the order that denied Cenvat credit, imposed duty demand, and penalties. The authority found discrepancies in the invoicing and transportation process but accepted the appellant&#039;s evidence of proper documentation and payment to the transporter. The Revenue&#039;s allegations of incapability of vehicles used for transportation were deemed baseless as they lacked concrete evidence. The appellant&#039;s documented evidence remained uncontested, leading to the conclusion that the Revenue&#039;s claims were unsupported. The appeal was granted, emphasizing the importance of substantiated evidence in such disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332314</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>