<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 679 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186321</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision regarding the treatment of rental income as income from house property, citing a previous decision in the assessee&#039;s favor. Additionally, the Tribunal supported the allowance of bad debts by CIT(A), stating they were genuine transactions and justified after legal proceedings. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the Tribunal pronounced the order on 4.10.2011.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2016 14:54:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441101" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 679 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186321</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision regarding the treatment of rental income as income from house property, citing a previous decision in the assessee&#039;s favor. Additionally, the Tribunal supported the allowance of bad debts by CIT(A), stating they were genuine transactions and justified after legal proceedings. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the Tribunal pronounced the order on 4.10.2011.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186321</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>