<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 525 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186318</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal in part. The addition of Rs. 10,35,562 on account of alleged unaccounted income from the sale of jewellery declared under VDIS, 1997 was deleted. The Tribunal dismissed the second ground regarding Rs. 28,679 as not pressed, making it infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2016 14:12:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 525 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186318</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal in part. The addition of Rs. 10,35,562 on account of alleged unaccounted income from the sale of jewellery declared under VDIS, 1997 was deleted. The Tribunal dismissed the second ground regarding Rs. 28,679 as not pressed, making it infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>