<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 561 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332300</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed specific writ petitions challenging assessment orders, emphasizing the petitioner&#039;s entitlement to the waiver scheme under the valid amended Eligibility Certificate. The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, quashing the impugned orders, as long as the amended certificate remained valid and unrevoked. The court highlighted the lack of evidence supporting the cancellation or modification of the amended certificate by competent authorities, affirming the petitioner&#039;s right to the waiver benefits. Another petition seeking a Mandamus was closed as unnecessary, with no costs imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2016 13:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441082" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 561 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332300</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed specific writ petitions challenging assessment orders, emphasizing the petitioner&#039;s entitlement to the waiver scheme under the valid amended Eligibility Certificate. The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, quashing the impugned orders, as long as the amended certificate remained valid and unrevoked. The court highlighted the lack of evidence supporting the cancellation or modification of the amended certificate by competent authorities, affirming the petitioner&#039;s right to the waiver benefits. Another petition seeking a Mandamus was closed as unnecessary, with no costs imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332300</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>