<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (3) TMI 13 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5024</link>
    <description>In computing taxable profits of an insurer other than a life insurer, the annual accounts under the Insurance Act, including the appropriation account, form the basis of assessment subject to Income-tax Act adjustments. A bonus payable to renewing policyholders under a mercantile bonus scheme was deductible because the liability crystallised on renewal, was properly reflected in the accounts, and was incurred wholly and exclusively for the business. It was not disallowed merely because it appeared in the appropriation account rather than the profit and loss account, and it was not treated as a mere appropriation of profits or a contingent liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44107" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (3) TMI 13 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5024</link>
      <description>In computing taxable profits of an insurer other than a life insurer, the annual accounts under the Insurance Act, including the appropriation account, form the basis of assessment subject to Income-tax Act adjustments. A bonus payable to renewing policyholders under a mercantile bonus scheme was deductible because the liability crystallised on renewal, was properly reflected in the accounts, and was incurred wholly and exclusively for the business. It was not disallowed merely because it appeared in the appropriation account rather than the profit and loss account, and it was not treated as a mere appropriation of profits or a contingent liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5024</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>