<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 551 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332290</link>
    <description>Transmission charges and State Load Despatch Centre charges paid for use of the electricity transmission network were not fees for technical services, because the arrangement involved no transfer of technology, human intervention, or technical expertise rendered to the assessee. Following earlier decisions on identical facts, the Karnataka HC held that Section 194J did not apply and the assessee was not liable to deduct tax at source on those payments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 18:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441067" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 551 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332290</link>
      <description>Transmission charges and State Load Despatch Centre charges paid for use of the electricity transmission network were not fees for technical services, because the arrangement involved no transfer of technology, human intervention, or technical expertise rendered to the assessee. Following earlier decisions on identical facts, the Karnataka HC held that Section 194J did not apply and the assessee was not liable to deduct tax at source on those payments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332290</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>