<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 549 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332288</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, granting partial relief on the disallowed remuneration and full relief on the disallowed Free of Cost (FOC) expenses. The Tribunal found the significant increase in remuneration to the daughter-in-law excessive, reducing it to a reasonable amount. Additionally, the Tribunal accepted the FOC expenses as legitimate sales promotion tactics and overturned their disallowance. The decision was pronounced on 3rd August, 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2016 17:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441065" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 549 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332288</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, granting partial relief on the disallowed remuneration and full relief on the disallowed Free of Cost (FOC) expenses. The Tribunal found the significant increase in remuneration to the daughter-in-law excessive, reducing it to a reasonable amount. Additionally, the Tribunal accepted the FOC expenses as legitimate sales promotion tactics and overturned their disallowance. The decision was pronounced on 3rd August, 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332288</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>