<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 542 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332281</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 90,00,000 assessed as business receipts under section 28(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal agreed that the transaction involved the purchase and subsequent sale of a business, resulting in no short-term capital gain. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the capital asset treatment and Nil capital gain computation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2016 13:23:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 542 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332281</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 90,00,000 assessed as business receipts under section 28(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal agreed that the transaction involved the purchase and subsequent sale of a business, resulting in no short-term capital gain. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the capital asset treatment and Nil capital gain computation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332281</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>