<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (3) TMI 12 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5022</link>
    <description>Income can be clubbed under section 16(3)(a)(iv) only if the minor&#039;s share income directly or indirectly arises from assets transferred by the assessee. Mere admission of a minor to the benefits of partnership, or the existence of allied firms with financial connections, is insufficient unless a real nexus between the transferred assets and the income is proved. On the facts stated, there was no cogent basis to attribute the profits from the Galla and Calcutta firms to the father&#039;s gifted capital, and no evidence that the Dhubri firm share arose because capital was introduced as a condition of admission. The share income was therefore not includible in the father&#039;s assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44105" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (3) TMI 12 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5022</link>
      <description>Income can be clubbed under section 16(3)(a)(iv) only if the minor&#039;s share income directly or indirectly arises from assets transferred by the assessee. Mere admission of a minor to the benefits of partnership, or the existence of allied firms with financial connections, is insufficient unless a real nexus between the transferred assets and the income is proved. On the facts stated, there was no cogent basis to attribute the profits from the Galla and Calcutta firms to the father&#039;s gifted capital, and no evidence that the Dhubri firm share arose because capital was introduced as a condition of admission. The share income was therefore not includible in the father&#039;s assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5022</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>