<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1127 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186304</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal by directing the Assessing Officer to grant higher depreciation on specific electrical equipment. The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision regarding the depreciation rates on computers and peripherals, emphasizing that only computer peripherals could be considered as computers for depreciation purposes, while other items fell under plant and machinery categories.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2016 10:34:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1127 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186304</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal by directing the Assessing Officer to grant higher depreciation on specific electrical equipment. The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision regarding the depreciation rates on computers and peripherals, emphasizing that only computer peripherals could be considered as computers for depreciation purposes, while other items fell under plant and machinery categories.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186304</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>