<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (3) TMI 11 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5021</link>
    <description>Simultaneous cross-settlements between related parties may amount to an indirect transfer of assets under section 16(3)(a)(iv) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 where the transactions are inter-connected parts of the same arrangement adopted to evade the section. The governing enquiry is not confined to whether each transfer is outwardly real or supported by technical consideration, but whether the surrounding circumstances show a composite device designed to defeat the statutory provision. The material evidence must be considered as a whole, and a narrow focus on simultaneity or formal consideration is insufficient. The correct legal test therefore requires reconsideration on the full facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44104" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (3) TMI 11 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5021</link>
      <description>Simultaneous cross-settlements between related parties may amount to an indirect transfer of assets under section 16(3)(a)(iv) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 where the transactions are inter-connected parts of the same arrangement adopted to evade the section. The governing enquiry is not confined to whether each transfer is outwardly real or supported by technical consideration, but whether the surrounding circumstances show a composite device designed to defeat the statutory provision. The material evidence must be considered as a whole, and a narrow focus on simultaneity or formal consideration is insufficient. The correct legal test therefore requires reconsideration on the full facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5021</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>