<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 1219 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186298</link>
    <description>The appeal by the revenue against the deletion of an addition made under section 68 regarding share application money was allowed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to establish the identity of the shareholders and the justification for the premium charged per share. The matter was remanded back to the Assessing Officer to provide the assessee with an opportunity to prove the identity of the shareholders. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2016 18:21:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441031" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 1219 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186298</link>
      <description>The appeal by the revenue against the deletion of an addition made under section 68 regarding share application money was allowed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to establish the identity of the shareholders and the justification for the premium charged per share. The matter was remanded back to the Assessing Officer to provide the assessee with an opportunity to prove the identity of the shareholders. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186298</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>