<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 1138 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186297</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with reductions in the additions sustained by the CIT(A) for the capital introduced by the partners. The Tribunal reduced the additions for each partner based on various considerations, such as borrowed funds and agricultural income. The order was pronounced in open court on 9/4/2010.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2016 17:13:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441028" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 1138 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186297</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with reductions in the additions sustained by the CIT(A) for the capital introduced by the partners. The Tribunal reduced the additions for each partner based on various considerations, such as borrowed funds and agricultural income. The order was pronounced in open court on 9/4/2010.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186297</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>