<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (4) TMI 513 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186294</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax under Section 263 was vacated, restoring the original assessment by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal concluded that the interest paid on foreign borrowing was allowable, and the provisions of Sections 58(1)(a)(ii), 195, and 9(1)(v) did not apply to disallow the interest payment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2016 17:00:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441025" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (4) TMI 513 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186294</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax under Section 263 was vacated, restoring the original assessment by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal concluded that the interest paid on foreign borrowing was allowable, and the provisions of Sections 58(1)(a)(ii), 195, and 9(1)(v) did not apply to disallow the interest payment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186294</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>