https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332270 Clandestine removal of excisable pharmaceutical goods without payment of duty led to confirmation of the duty demand and penalties under the penal provisions. The Tribunal noted that partners of a partnership firm are jointly liable, and the penalties imposed on the partners were sustainable on that basis. It further held that no additional penalty was called for in the circumstances. The Revenue's request for further interference with the Commissioner's order was rejected, and the Commissioner's order was left undisturbed. en-us Mon, 01 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Jan 2017 11:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332270 Clandestine removal of excisable pharmaceutical goods without payment of duty led to confirmation of the duty demand and penalties under the penal provisions. The Tribunal noted that partners of a partnership firm are jointly liable, and the penalties imposed on the partners were sustainable on that basis. It further held that no additional penalty was called for in the circumstances. The Revenue's request for further interference with the Commissioner's order was rejected, and the Commissioner's order was left undisturbed. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 01 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332270