https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332269 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision, emphasizing the importance of verifying facts before initiating legal actions to prevent premature appeals and unnecessary litigation. The appeal by the Revenue was deemed unnecessary due to a factual discrepancy regarding the timing of the intimation of the rejection of the remission of duty, as the respondent claimed no intimation was received until a later date. The Tribunal highlighted the lack of communication regarding the rejection of remission of duty and urged officers to verify case facts before filing appeals to avoid unwarranted legal actions. en-us Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Jan 2017 16:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332269 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision, emphasizing the importance of verifying facts before initiating legal actions to prevent premature appeals and unnecessary litigation. The appeal by the Revenue was deemed unnecessary due to a factual discrepancy regarding the timing of the intimation of the rejection of the remission of duty, as the respondent claimed no intimation was received until a later date. The Tribunal highlighted the lack of communication regarding the rejection of remission of duty and urged officers to verify case facts before filing appeals to avoid unwarranted legal actions. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332269